9月9日上午，江西省南昌市中级人民法院依法对被告人劳荣枝故意杀人、抢劫、绑架案进行一审公开宣判。以被告人劳荣枝犯故意杀人罪、抢劫罪、绑架罪，数罪并罚，决定执行死刑，剥夺政治权利终身，并处没收个人全部财产。其当庭表示上诉。一图看懂劳荣枝案↓

On the morning of September 9, the intermediate people's Court of Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province publicly pronounced a judgment of first instance in the case of intentional homicide, robbery and  kidnapping of the defendant Lao Rongzhi. The defendant Lao Rongzhi committed the crime of intentional homicide, robbery and kidnapping, and was sentenced to death for several crimes. He was deprived of political rights for life and confiscated all his personal property. I. understand the Lao Rongzhi case ↓

备受社会关注的本案被告人劳荣枝，1974年生，江西九江人，1996年至1999年，劳荣枝与男友法子英在南昌、温州、合肥等地实施犯罪，涉及多起命案。1999年，法子英在安徽合肥落网，同年被执行死刑。案发后，劳荣枝潜逃，2019年11月28日，逃亡20年的劳荣枝在厦门被公安机关抓获。2019年11月27日，厦门警方在“云剑行动”中，经过缜密分析研判，发现外地命案逃犯劳某枝（女，45岁，江西九江人）在我市出现。警方迅速行动，立即展开布控抓捕，并于11月28日上午9时许在厦门某商场将劳某枝抓获。

The defendant of this case, Lao Rongzhi, born in 1974 in Jiujiang, Jiangxi Province, has attracted much public attention. From 1996 to 1999, Lao Rongzhi and her boyfriend FA Ziying committed crimes in Nanchang, Wenzhou, Hefei and other places, involving multiple homicides. In 1999, faziying was arrested in Hefei, Anhui Province and executed in the same year. After the incident, Lao Rongzhi absconded. On November 28, 2019, Lao Rongzhi, who had fled for 20 years, was arrested by the public security organ in Xiamen.On November 27, 2019, during the "cloud sword operation", Xiamen police found that the fugitive Lao mouzhi (female, 45 years old, from Jiujiang, Jiangxi) from a foreign homicide case appeared in our city after careful analysis and judgment. The police acted quickly, immediately launched control and arrest, and arrested Lao in a shopping mall in Xiamen at about 9 a.m. on November 28.

据检察机关指控：被告人劳荣枝与法子英系情侣关系。1996年至1999年间，二人共谋且分工明确，由劳荣枝在娱乐场所做陪侍小姐物色有钱人为作案对象，分别在江西省南昌市、浙江省温州市、江苏省常州市、安徽省合肥市共同实施抢劫、绑架及故意杀人犯罪。案发后，劳荣枝使用“雪莉”等化名潜逃。劳荣枝供述，在潜逃的20年里，为了逃避打击，她不仅整了容，还隐姓埋名，使用多个虚假名字流窜于不同城市间，靠在酒吧KTV等场所打零工短工谋生。2019年11月28日，劳荣枝被公安机关抓获归案。

According to the accusation of the procuratorial organ, the defendant Lao Rongzhi has a relationship with French and British couples. From 1996 to 1999, the two conspired and had a clear division of labor. Lao Rongzhi worked as a waitress in entertainment places to find rich people to commit crimes. They jointly committed robbery, kidnapping and intentional homicide in Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province and Hefei City, Anhui Province. After the incident, Lao Rongzhi absconded under pseudonyms such as "Shirley". Lao Rongzhi confessed that during the 20 years of absconding, in order to escape the attack, she not only changed her face, but also hid her name, used multiple false names to flee between different cities, and made a living by doing odd jobs in bars, KTVs and other places. On November 28, 2019, Lao Rongzhi was arrested by the public security organ.

2019年12月17日，江西省南昌市人民检察院依法对犯罪嫌疑人劳荣枝批准逮捕。2020年8月31日，江西省南昌市人民检察院依法对劳荣枝涉嫌故意杀人、绑架、抢劫罪一案向南昌市中级人民法院提起公诉。2020年12月21日、22日，劳荣枝案在南昌市中级人民法院开庭审理，检察机关以故意杀人罪、抢劫罪、绑架罪起诉劳荣枝。庭审中，劳荣枝否认部分指控，声称受法子英胁迫。该案经过两天的审理，法院宣布休庭，另行择期宣判。

On December 17, 2019, the people's Procuratorate of Nanchang city of Jiangxi Province approved the arrest of the suspect, Rao Rong, according to law. On August 31, 2020, Nanchang people's Procuratorate of Jiangxi Province filed a public prosecution against Lao Rongzhi in Nanchang intermediate people's Court on suspicion of intentional homicide, kidnapping and robbery. On December 21 and 22, 2020, the case of Lao Rongzhi was heard in Nanchang intermediate people's court. The procuratorial organ sued Lao Rongzhi for intentional homicide, robbery and kidnapping. During the trial, Lao Rongzhi denied some of the charges and claimed to be coerced by France and Britain. After two days of trial, the court adjourned the case and pronounced a judgment at a different time.

身负7条人命、逃亡20年，2020年12月，劳荣枝故意杀人、绑架、抢劫一案在南昌市中级人民法院开庭审理。庭审中，控辩双方就四起绑架杀人案的焦点问题充分举证质证。本台记者独家拍摄了庭审全过程，案件相关的关键细节逐一呈现在了法庭之上。

In December 2020, Lao Rongzhi's case of intentional homicide, kidnapping and robbery was heard in Nanchang intermediate people's court. During the trial, the prosecution and the defense fully provided evidence and cross examined the focus of the four kidnapping and homicide cases. Our reporter exclusively photographed the whole process of the trial, and the key details related to the case were presented in the court one by one.

劳荣枝当庭翻供 否认杀人

Lao Rongzhi retracted his confession in court and denied killing

在两天共15个多小时的庭审过程中，公诉方就劳荣枝所牵涉的南昌、温州、常州与合肥四地的犯罪案件进行了举证，其中包括劳荣枝的男友法子英生前供述、证人证言及相关物证。对此，劳荣枝否认了故意杀人的指控，声称自己参与杀人是遭到了法子英的胁迫。

During the two-day trial, which lasted more than 15 hours, the prosecution provided evidence on the criminal cases involving Lao Rongzhi in Nanchang, Wenzhou, Changzhou and Hefei, including the confession, witness testimony and relevant material evidence of Lao Rongzhi's boyfriend faziying. In this regard, Lao Rongzhi denied the accusation of intentional homicide and claimed that his participation in the homicide was coerced by France and Britain.

被告人 劳荣枝： 我不认可公诉人对我的指控，包括故意杀人罪这项罪名我也不认可。抢劫罪还有绑架罪我承认，我说了在常州、在合肥我的的确确是配合，因为我摆脱不了法子英，我确确实实是受到了胁迫。

Defendant Lao Rongzhi: I don't agree with the prosecutor's charges against me, including the crime of intentional homicide. I admit the crime of robbery and kidnapping. I said I really cooperated in Changzhou and Hefei, because I couldn't get rid of France and Britain. I was really coerced.

我这一辈子没有杀过一只鸡，没有杀过一只鸭，我不敢去做这样的事情，我只有感恩，做人要有一颗感恩的心。

I have never killed a chicken or a duck in my life. I dare not do such a thing. I only have gratitude. I should have a grateful heart.

审判员：被告人劳荣枝，法庭提醒一下啊，那个直接回答辩护人的发问。

Judge: the defendant, Lao Rongzhi, the court reminds me, that answer the questions of the defender directly.

南昌灭门案 怕留指纹提议放火烧屋

Nanchang extermination case, afraid to leave fingerprints, proposed to set fire to the house

劳荣枝的此类辩护贯穿了整个庭审过程，公诉方认为，4起案件中劳荣枝和男友均为主犯，由二人共同商定并分工明确。

Such defense of Lao Rongzhi runs through the whole trial process. The public prosecution believes that in the four cases, Lao Rongzhi and her boyfriend are the principal offenders, which are jointly agreed by the two and have a clear division of labor.

1996年7月28日的南昌灭门案是劳荣枝和男友法子英共谋的第一起案件，公诉方出示的证据显示，二人的供述中都提到了“两人共同商定由劳荣枝去娱乐场所坐台物色绑架对象”，被害人熊某就是由劳荣枝在陪酒时物色到的。

The Nanchang extermination case on July 28, 1996 was the first case in which Lao Rongzhi and her boyfriend FA Ziying conspired. The evidence presented by the public prosecution showed that both of them mentioned that "they jointly agreed that Lao Rongzhi should go to entertainment places to look for kidnapping objects". The victim Xiong was found by Lao Rongzhi while drinking.

公诉人： 2019年12月2日供述，熊老板到我（劳荣枝）的出租屋后法子英用刀架在他脖子上，并让我用绳子将熊老板绑起来，我先把熊老板的双腿的脚脖子绑起来，先横着绑几圈，再在两腿中间绑几圈，再重复几次，这样可以确保每条腿都能固定不容易挣脱，手也是这么绑的。

Prosecutor: on December 2, 2019, after boss Xiong came to my (Lao Rongzhi) rental house, FA Ziying put a knife around his neck and asked me to tie boss Xiong up with a rope. I first tied the ankle of boss Xiong's legs horizontally, then tied them in the middle of his legs, and then repeated them several times, so as to ensure that each leg can be fixed and not easy to break free, That's how your hands are tied.

起诉书显示，劳荣枝和法子英从熊某身上抢走金项链及家房门钥匙等财物，并威逼其说出家庭住址。其间，法子英将熊某勒死并分尸。当天晚上，二人携带尖刀前往熊某家，由法子英使用尖刀、绳子和皮带等物对熊某的妻子张某进行人身控制，劳荣枝在房间翻找财物，抢得金银首饰、现金、债券等财物。其间，法子英残忍地将张某和其3岁女儿勒死。随后，劳荣枝与法子英逃离了南昌市。

The indictment shows that Lao Rongzhi and FA Ziying robbed Xiong of gold necklaces, home keys and other property, and forced him to say his home address. Meanwhile, faziying strangled Xiong and divided his body. That night, the two went to Xiong's house with sharp knives. Faziying used sharp knives, ropes and belts to control Xiong's wife Zhang. Lao Rongzhi searched for property in the room and robbed gold and silver jewelry, cash, bonds and other property. Meanwhile, faziying cruelly strangled Zhang and his 3-year-old daughter. Subsequently, Lao Rongzhi and FA Ziying fled Nanchang.

公诉人指控，劳荣枝在该起案件中不仅是主谋，而且主观恶意性极强，她在供述中声称担心指纹留在现场，曾对法子英说：“不如一把火烧了这个家”，但这一行为被法子英制止。

The prosecutor charged that Lao Rongzhi was not only the mastermind in the case, but also had strong subjective malice. In her confession, she claimed that she was worried that the fingerprints would remain at the scene and once said to FA Ziying, "it's better to burn this home with a fire", but this behavior was stopped by FA Ziying.

公诉人： 劳荣枝在侦查阶段四次提到自己提议放火烧熊某一家，而不管张莉母女是死是活，这都反映了劳荣枝致人死亡的主观故意。

Prosecutor: Lao Rongzhi mentioned four times in the investigation stage that he proposed to set fire to a bear family, regardless of whether Zhang Li's mother and daughter are dead or alive, which reflects Lao Rongzhi's subjective intention to cause death.

温州杀人案 编造“租房”假话 引诱被害人进门

Wenzhou homicide fabricated the lie of "renting a house" to lure the victim into the door

南昌灭门案之后，劳荣枝与法子英于1997年9月逃到浙江省温州市，二人继续沿用南昌的作案模式，由劳荣枝做陪酒小姐去物色作案对象，被害人梁某成为二人的猎物。

After the Nanchang massacre, Lao Rongzhi and FA Ziying fled to Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province in September 1997. They continued to follow the crime mode of Nanchang. Lao Rongzhi was the hostess to find the target of the crime, and the victim Liang became their prey.

公诉人： 被告人劳荣枝2019年12月6日供述，当时跟我一起在KTV上班的一个女孩子说，她有房子要转租，法子英听到这个情况后，就决定绑架勒索这个女孩子，让我以租房名义带他一起到这个女孩子的房间去。

Prosecutor: the defendant Lao Rongzhi confessed on December 6, 2019 that a girl who worked in KTV with me said that she had a house to sublet. After hearing this, FA Ziying decided to kidnap and blackmail the girl and asked me to take him to the girl's room in the name of renting a house.

公诉方陈述，在法子英与劳荣枝的供述中都提到，二人持刀共同进入被害人梁某的住处实施抢劫。

The prosecution stated that in the confessions of faziying and Lao Rongzhi, they both mentioned that they jointly entered the victim Liang's residence with a knife to commit robbery.

公诉人： 我（劳荣枝）和法子英进门后，我们就把门关上了，法子英拿刀威胁那名小姐，我们就在这名小姐家里找了皮带、电线、绳子之类的东西，把这名女子绑起来，我记得是我绑的，我先把她的双脚绑起来了，随后又把她的双手手腕绑起来了。

Prosecutor: after I (Lao Rongzhi) and FA Ziying entered the door, we closed the door. FA Ziying threatened the young lady with a knife. We found belts, wires, ropes and other things in the young lady's house and tied the woman up. I remember I tied her feet first, and then tied her hands and wrists.

公诉方认为，对受害人梁某实施捆绑，这是劳荣枝与法子英共同犯罪的关键证据。随后两人又逼迫梁某打电话叫来了另外一名被害人刘某。

The prosecution believes that the binding of the victim Liang is the key evidence of the joint crime of Lao Rongzhi and France Ziying. Then they forced Liang to call another victim, Liu.

公诉人： 法子英逼迫被害人交出财物，并再叫一个有钱人来，劳荣枝在场未提出反对，还编造租房假话骗刘某进入案发现场，捆绑刘某，并事后取款。其地位与法子英具有相同重要的作用。

Prosecutor: FA Ziying forced the victim to hand over his property and called another rich man. Lao Rongzhi did not raise any objection at the scene. He also made up a lie about renting a house to deceive Liu into entering the scene of the crime, bind Liu, and withdraw money afterwards. Its status is as important as that of France and Britain.

独自取款冷静应对 “被胁迫”不成立

Withdrawal alone and calm response to "being coerced" is not tenable

根据劳荣枝二人的供述，在抢走被害人的现金和手机之后，由劳荣枝拿着被害人的存折去银行提款。证人证言显示，当时银行柜员问劳荣枝为什么不是本人来取款，劳荣枝镇定回答“本人有事”，并在提款单上写下了被害人的名字。公诉方认为，作案后这些冷静的操作，再次证明劳荣枝所辩称地受到胁迫不能成立。

According to Lao Rongzhi's confession, after stealing the victim's cash and mobile phone, Lao Rongzhi took the victim's passbook to the bank to withdraw money. The witness testimony showed that when the bank teller asked Lao Rongzhi why he didn't withdraw the money himself, Lao Rongzhi calmly replied "I have something to do" and wrote down the name of the victim on the withdrawal slip. The prosecution believes that these calm operations after the crime once again prove that Lao Rongzhi's alleged coercion cannot be established.

公诉人： 劳荣枝在取款后电话通知法子英，钱已到手。这个是给法子英一个非常重要的提示信号，就是成功取款，法子英就可以自由善后了。

Prosecutor: after withdrawing the money, Lao Rongzhi telephoned France Ziying that the money had arrived. This is a very important reminder signal for faziying, that is, if she withdraws successfully, faziying can deal with the aftermath freely.

法子英在接到取款成功的电话后，勒死了两名被害人，公诉人认为劳荣枝打电话的这一行为，是造成两名被害人死亡的原因之一。

Faziying strangled two victims after receiving a successful phone call. The prosecutor believes that Lao Rongzhi's phone call is one of the reasons for the deaths of the two victims.

作案手法残忍 不构成立功自首

Cruel modus operandi does not constitute voluntary surrender for meritorious service

在温州作案之后，劳荣枝二人绑架抢劫杀人的罪恶之手没有罢手，在1998年的夏天，两人逃窜到江苏省常州市，继续此前两案的作案模式实施犯罪。

After committing the crime in Wenzhou, Lao Rongzhi and his criminal hands of kidnapping, robbery and murder did not stop. In the summer of 1998, they fled to Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province and continued to commit the crime in the previous two cases.

“幸存者”证言：劳荣枝手段残忍

Testimony of "Survivor": Lao Rongzhi's means are cruel

起诉书中显示，在江苏常州，被害人刘某被劳荣枝骗到了出租屋，事先躲藏在室内的法子英持刀威胁刘某，并刺破刘某胸口。劳荣枝用事先准备好的铁丝将刘某捆绑在扶手椅上。被害人刘某是劳荣枝二人系列抢劫杀人案中唯一的幸存者，根据刘某的陈述，时隔20多年，他身上仍留有当年被铁丝捆绑所留下的伤痕。

The indictment shows that in Changzhou, Jiangsu, the victim Liu was cheated by Lao Rongzhi into a rental house. FA Ziying, who hid indoors in advance, threatened Liu with a knife and stabbed Liu in the chest. Lao Rongzhi tied Liu to the armchair with a prepared iron wire. The victim Liu is the only survivor of the series of robberies and murders by Lao Rongzhi. According to Liu's statement, after more than 20 years, he still has the scars left by being bound by iron wire that year.

公诉人： 那位坐台小姐拿出几根铁丝，直接把我的双手双脚绑在椅子上，我双脚的脚踝、膝盖用铁丝绑在椅子脚上，胳膊用铁丝绑在椅子靠背上。他们之间很有默契，绑我的时候都没有怎么交流。

Prosecutor: the lady took out some iron wires and directly tied my hands and feet to the chair. My ankles and knees were tied to the chair feet with iron wires, and my arms were tied to the chair back with iron wires. There was a tacit understanding between them. They didn't communicate much when they tied me.

刘某的证言还显示，劳荣枝在单独看管他期间，数次以割喉夺命相威胁。

Liu's testimony also showed that Lao Rongzhi threatened his life by cutting his throat several times during his separate custody.

公诉人： 那个女的看到我在挣扎，就站在我身后，拿着刀架在我的后颈脖处，威胁我说不许动，再动就杀掉你。

Prosecutor: seeing that I was struggling, the woman stood behind me, took the knife rest at the back of my neck and threatened me not to move. If she moved again, she would kill you.

随后二人逼迫刘某打电话给其妻子索要财物。并由劳荣枝前往指定地点将刘某妻子带回出租房。刘某妻子带来了70000元赎金，拿到钱之后，劳荣枝和法子英先后离开了现场。庭审中，劳荣枝的辩护律师称，常州绑架案是劳荣枝到案后主动交代的犯罪事实，具有立功自首的表现，对此公诉方当庭表示不予支持。

Then they forced Liu to call his wife and ask for property. And Lao Rongzhi went to the designated place to take Liu's wife back to the rental house. Liu's wife brought a ransom of 70000 yuan. After getting the money, Lao Rongzhi and FA Ziying left the scene successively. During the trial, Lao Rongzhi's defense lawyer said that the Changzhou kidnapping case was a criminal fact voluntarily confessed by Lao Rongzhi after he arrived at the case, which showed meritorious service and voluntary surrender. The public prosecution expressed no support in court.

公诉人： 因为法子英到案后已经详细供述了常州犯罪事实，并且明确了劳荣枝系其共犯，合肥市公安局也于当年就对其进行了追捕。因此常州事实属于公安机关已经掌握的犯罪事实，不具有立功自首，坦白和从轻减轻处罚情节。

Public prosecutor: because FA Ziying has confessed the facts of Changzhou's crime in detail and made it clear that Lao Rongzhi is his accomplice, Hefei public security bureau pursued him that year. Therefore, the fact of Changzhou belongs to the criminal fact that the public security organ has mastered, and does not have the circumstances of voluntary surrender, confession and lighter punishment.

变本加厉 走向末路

Intensify to the end

1999年6月，劳荣枝二人逃窜到了安徽省合肥市，二人继续沿用前三次的作案模式，并且变本加厉，以“关狗”为名，提前定制了一只钢筋笼。劳荣枝在合肥引诱受害人殷某进入出租屋后，法子英用尖刀胁迫殷某将其关进了笼子。

In June 1999, Lao Rongzhi fled to Hefei City, Anhui Province. They continued to use the previous three crime patterns and intensified their efforts. In the name of "closing the dog", they customized a steel cage in advance. After Lao Rongzhi lured the victim Yin into the rental house in Hefei, France and Britain coerced Yin into a cage with a sharp knife.

在逼迫之下，殷某给妻子写了尽快送钱的字条，随后法子英拿着字条来到殷某家，殷某妻子以筹钱为由让其在家中等待，随后外出报警。这一次恶行累累的法子英被警方抓获，并在当年被依法执行死刑。

Under pressure, Yin wrote a note to his wife to send money as soon as possible. Then FA Ziying came to Yin's house with the note. Yin's wife asked him to wait at home on the grounds of raising money, and then went out to call the police. This time, FA Ziying, who had committed many crimes, was arrested by the police and executed according to law that year.

法子英当年被警方抓获的5天后，在二人作案的出租屋内，警方发现了两具尸体，而劳荣枝早已经不见踪影。

Five days after faziying was arrested by the police, the police found two bodies in the rental house where they committed the crime, and Lao Rongzhi had long disappeared.

屋内的两名被害人其中一名为殷某，而另一名经警方查明为陆某，事发前是一名木匠。法子英到案后供述，他以做木工为由将陆某骗到屋内残忍杀害，目的竟然是为了恐吓殷某，让他写字条给妻子尽快交钱。对此，公诉方认为，劳荣枝二人残忍的作案手段印证了被告人漠视他人生命的主观心态。

One of the two victims in the house was Yin, and the other was identified by the police as Lu. Before the incident, he was a carpenter. After faziying came to the case, he confessed that he cheated Lu into the house and killed him cruelly on the grounds of carpentry. The purpose was to intimidate Yin and let him write a note to his wife to pay the money as soon as possible. In this regard, the prosecution believes that the cruel means of committing the crime of Lao Rongzhi and his wife confirm the defendant's subjective mentality of ignoring other people's lives.

公诉人： 每一个案发现场都令人发指，极其残忍的作案手段完全突破人性底线。

Prosecutor: every crime scene is heinous. The extremely cruel means of crime completely break through the bottom line of human nature.

合肥案中的庭审焦点为被害人殷某是否为劳荣枝所杀？公诉方出示了几点关键证据认为殷某的死亡是劳荣枝所为。法子英和劳荣枝的供述相互印证，法子英在外出期间曾四次交代劳荣枝，如果殷某反抗，就用铁丝勒死他。而殷某的尸检报告也显示其死于被人勒颈窒息死亡。

The trial focus in Hefei case was whether the victim Yin was killed by Lao Rongzhi? The prosecution produced several key evidence and believed that Lao Rongzhi was responsible for Yin's death. The confessions of faziying and Lao Rongzhi confirmed each other. Faziying told Lao Rongzhi four times when he was out. If Yan resisted, he would strangle him with iron wire. The autopsy report of Yin also showed that he died of strangulation.

公诉方还指出，法子英在落网后并不确定出租屋内共死了几个人。

The prosecution also pointed out that France and Britain were not sure that several people died in the rental house after they were arrested.

公诉人： 法子英与律师的会见笔录中，法子英问律师合肥死了几个人，律师告诉法子英是两个人，律师追问法子英，殷某是不是你杀的？法子英回避这个问题表示不想说了，这更说明法子英对殷某死亡当时是不确切无知的。

Prosecutor: in the interview record between FA Ziying and the lawyer, FA Ziying asked the lawyer how many people died in Hefei. The lawyer told FA Ziying that there were two people. The lawyer asked FA Ziying whether you killed yin? FA Ziying avoided this question and said she didn't want to say it, which further shows that FA Ziying was not exactly ignorant of Yin's death at that time.

公诉方直指劳荣枝与法子英二人均系主犯

The prosecution pointed out that Lao Rongzhi and FA Ziying were both principal criminals

公诉方认为劳荣枝到案后，侦查机关用了7个月时间进行了48次讯问，公诉人认真审查了48份供述，结合当年法子英的供述，得出的劳荣枝定罪依据充分真实，劳荣枝与法子英共同实施的系列犯罪，二人均系主犯。

The public prosecution believes that after Lao Rongzhi arrived at the case, the investigation organ spent seven months to conduct 48 interrogations, and the public prosecutor carefully examined 48 confessions. Combined with the confessions of FA Ziying in that year, the basis for Lao Rongzhi's conviction is fully true. For a series of crimes jointly committed by Lao Rongzhi and FA Ziying, both of them are the principal offenders.

公诉人： 二人在四起犯罪事实中均存在明确共谋和分工，其伙同法子英实施犯罪的方式和分工反映出其主犯地位，其拒不认罪的态度、不合常理的辩解、苍白无力的借口都将得到法律公正的评判。

Public prosecutor: there is a clear conspiracy and division of labor between the two in the four criminal facts. The way and division of labor they committed the crime together with France and Britain reflect their status as the principal offender. Their attitude of refusing to plead guilty, unreasonable excuses and weak excuses will be judged fairly by the law.

这是一场迟到了20年的庭审，但正义不会缺席。手段极其残忍、犯罪后果极其严重，社会危害性极大，主观恶性极深，公诉意见书用四个“极”字，直指杀害7人的罪大恶极。天网恢恢，逃无可逃，突破了人性与法律的底线，就必将受到法律的严惩。

This is a trial 20 years late, but justice will not be absent. The means are extremely cruel, the consequences of the crime are extremely serious, the social harm is great, and the subjective malignancy is very deep. The public prosecution opinion uses four "poles" to directly point to the heinous crime of killing seven people. If we break through the bottom line of human nature and law, we will be severely punished by the law.

（总台央视记者 武兵 李兵 周亚峰）

(CCTV reporter Wu Bing, Li Bing, Zhou Yafeng)

相关链接

Related links

劳荣枝的堕落之路

Lao Rongzhi's degenerate Road